"Juergen Arlt" <[email protected]> wrote on 28/07/2009 15:09:49: > > I don't want to worm up the long discussion that took place in January > (thanks to Joakims hint) but I still read that the option 1 should be > used to advertise the remote router IP as a stub host route - though it > is not required for the protocol to work. I agree however that in the > LSA example of 2328 Router 3 ommited the option 1 as well. > > But the advertisement of the neighbor IP is clearly stated in RFC 1583 > and I would read now the same in 2328. > > Quote "When interface addresses are assigned, they are modelled as stub > links, with each router advertising a stub connection to the other > router's interface address."
BTW, I read "interface addresses are assigned" == numbered so this para does not apply to unnumbered I/F's Jocke _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
