Hi Acee,
There is at least a little end user interest in this, I think it should
be a WG document.
Regards,
Michael
Acee Lindem wrote:
For some time we've discussed adding IPsec support for OSPFv2 analogous
to what we have for OSPFv3. The draft subject draft describes how we'd
build on the OSPFv3 support to support OSPFv2:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-gupta-ospf-ospfv2-sec-01.txt
What are the current thoughts as far as adding this as a WG document?
Thanks,
Acee
P.S. The formatting issues will be fixed in the next
revision._______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
