This Errata looks correct to me. Thanks, Acee On Jul 29, 2010, at 6:17 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2328, > "OSPF Version 2". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2328&eid=2394 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Andrea Ceschia <[email protected]> > > Section: 3.4. > > Original Text > ------------- > Table 5: Backbone distances calculated by Routers RT3 and RT4 > > dist from dist from > RT3 RT4 > > to Ia 20 27 > to Ib 15 22 > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Table 5: Backbone distances calculated by Routers RT3 and RT4. > > dist from dist from > RT3 RT4 > > to Ia 15 22 > to Ib 20 27 > > Notes > ----- > From RT3 and RT4 perspective the Ia is the nearest interface while Ib is at > the remote side of the link connecting RT6 to RT10. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC2328 (no draft string recorded) > -------------------------------------- > Title : OSPF Version 2 > Publication Date : April 1998 > Author(s) : J. Moy > Category : STANDARD > Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP > Area : Routing > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
