Vikram, We don't need a new draft for this. If you search the mailing list archives you'll find that someone else already suggested a draft on this subject and no one believed it was necessary given that 1) it is not required for interoperable protocol operation and 2) the optimization was in almost every implementation. Thanks, Acee On Nov 9, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Vikram Pendharkar wrote:
> That's good to know. In which case, would it make sense to update the > RFC for the same as well? > > Vikram > > > > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Dave Katz <[email protected]> wrote: >> All of the implementations I'm familiar with do exactly that. One has to be >> careful with the logic so as to not accidentally get into a Hello war with >> the neighbor, of course. >> >> --Dave >> >> On Nov 9, 2010, at 7:39 AM, Vikram Pendharkar wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Would there be any issues if as part of 1-Way event handling we >>> additionally send out a hello to the neighbor immediately rather than >>> wait for hello timer to expire. This should speed up adjacency >>> formation. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Vikram >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OSPF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
