On 01/20/2011 03:07 PM, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote:
Folks,
> I would not be against mandating support of LLS parsing for
> OSPFv3 AT support. It is as simple as examining the L-bit and
> bypassing the LLS block to get to the AT.
Then the larger question is that should AT also include the LLS block when
computing the hash?
I think it should, it is much more straightforward than authenticating
LLS separately.
In either case this needs to be specified in the draft.
Most definitely.
Regards,
Michael
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
