We've had a number of discussions with the chairs of the BEHAVE WG and are not opposed to this draft being accepted by the OSPF WG with an intended status of "Informational". We've also informed the SOFTWIRE WG chairs and they are acquiescent.
Hence, I'd now ask for support for or against accepting this as WG draft with intended status of informational. Here is a link for your convenience: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-cheng-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-03.txt Thanks, Acee
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
