------ Original Message ------ Received: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 07:43:06 PM PDT From: Curtis Villamizar <[email protected]> To: Abhay Roy <[email protected]>Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Last Call for Supporting Authentication Trailer for OSPFv3 - draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-03.txt
> > In message <[email protected]> > Abhay Roy writes: > > > > We are starting the Working Group Last Call of this revision of the > > subject draft. > > > > This drafts is intended to be a Proposed Standard. The OSPF WG last > > call will begin today and will end at 5pm PST, April 25th, 2011. > > > > Abhay/Acee > > > It is weak with only the 32 bit sequence number. That said, if there > is concensus for moving forward as-is I have no objection. It is a > step in the right direction, though IMHO it is too small a step in the > right direction and would not have to be revisited quite as soon if > something more robust were proposed. > > Bottom line. Falls short of what I'd like to see but no objection. > > Curtis I agree with Curis. I'd really like to see the first version of this spec at least have the extended sequence number as is being discussed for v2. Regards, Michael _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
