L3VPNers & OSPFers, This joint WG LC has now ended. One person commented on the L3VPN mailing list:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l3vpn/current/msg02903.html Can the authors continue to work to resolve the comments and produce an updated draft. Thanks Ben On 16 Mar 2011, at 07:44, Benjamin Niven-Jenkins wrote: > L3VPNers & OSPFers, > > You may recall that back in January 2010 we pulled > draft-ietf-l3vpn-ospfv3-pece-04 out of the RFC Editor's queue because we had > forgotten to solicit a review from the OSPF WG. See > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/current/msg05658.htm for more info > on that. > > The OSPF WG raised some comments on the draft, which has gone through a few > revisions and draft-ietf-l3vpn-ospfv3-pece-07 is thought to address all the > previous comments raised. > > This e-mail is therefore the start of a joint L3VPN & OSPF WG Last Call for > the updated draft. It is restricted to changes made since the last review > (i.e. changes between -04 and -07). > > Due to the proximity of IETF80 we are allowing 4 weeks for the LC. Please > provide any further comments on the changes by midnight PDT on the 13th April > 2011. > > You can view -07 of the draft here: > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-l3vpn-ospfv3-pece-07.txt > > You can view a diff between -04 and -07 here: > http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-l3vpn-ospfv3-pece-04&url2=draft-ietf-l3vpn-ospfv3-pece-07 > > Thanks > Ben (on behalf of the L3VPN & OSPF chairs) > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
