Hi Vladica, I agree that this has always been incorrect. It is interesting that nobody has complained.
You could issue errata for both RFCs. http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php Thanks, Acee On Apr 25, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Vladica Stanisic wrote: > I believe there is an error in the description of the MIB objects > ospfVirtNbrEvents and ospfv3VirtNbrEvents in RFCs 4750 and 5643 > > Description > > The number of times this virtual link has changed its state or an error has > occurred > > should be > > The number of times this virtual neighbor has changed its state or an error > has occurred > > Regards > > Vladica Stanisic > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
