All, At the WG meeting, we tentatively agreed that this RFC 3137 revision is needed in lieu of a separate document for OSPFv3 stub router. Is there anyone opposed to this becoming a WG document? If there is not significant opposition, we'll make it a WG document on Friday, May 20th (in one week). Thanks, Acee On May 9, 2011, at 3:54 PM, Retana, Alvaro wrote:
Hi! Following up on the WG meeting in Prague… http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-retana-ospf-rfc3137bis We just published version -01. The only change from -00 is an update on the authors’ contact information. This e-mail is the formal request for adoption as a WG document. Just like rfc 3137, the intended status is Informational. Thoughts/comments? Thanks! Alvaro. _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
