For now, the framework/requirement and rsvp-te document should be presented in MPLS. Don't worry about the draft names as that can be fixed at a later date.
Lou On 7/4/2011 7:15 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi Lou > > Would you like to inform us the decision? > Tonight is the deadline for 00-draft uploading. If chairs decide this > work should be posted to other WGs. So we will post them to a proper WG. > Otherwise we have to post framework/requirement and rsvp-te document to > CCAMP. The work is related both packet (e.g., MPLS) and tdm (e.g., OTN) > > Xihua > > > *Lou Berger <[email protected]>* > > 2011-06-30 下午 08:19 > > > 收件人 > [email protected] > 抄送 > Vishwas Manral <[email protected]>, Acee Lindem > <[email protected]>, CCAMP <[email protected]>, OSPF WG List > <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > 主题 > Re: [CCAMP] [OSPF] draft-giacalone-ospf-te-express-path-01 > > > > > > > > > Xihua, > For at least now, the OSPF work should be done in the > OSPF WG. The > chairs of the various candidate WG are having some off-line discussions > on were the requirements/RSVP work belongs. We should have an answer > for you by early next week. > > Lou > > PS Please don't cc [email protected] on mail you send, it makes the > mail system think your mail is a bounce! > > On 6/29/2011 9:44 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> I have a question to chairs and the authors. Because there are more and >> more documents appearing, we should think about how to move forward >> these work. >> What's your opinion? > > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
