Thanks Acee, Just a feed-back on one ID after the PCE WG meeting:
8) Updates to OSPF TE Extension for Area IDs Slides draft-lu-ospf-area-tlv-01.txt - Wenhu Lu 10 minutes See slides Abhay: What were comments in PCE presentation? Wenhu: Good reception. Why do we need to know Area ID? Isn't it enough to simply know if ABR is TE enabled? Solution avoids "brute force" solution and produces faster convergence. Abhay: Discussed with PCE chairs. RFC 5088 - extensions for PCE. Look at those extensions to see if they can be used. Wenhu: Will do that. JP> The draft was discussed in the PCE WG meeting, but there was no consensus that this document provides an extension that addresses a use case for PCE. To be discussed on the PCE mailing list and we will keep you posted. Thanks. JP. On Jul 29, 2011, at 9:30 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: > I've posted the IETF WG Minutes. Thanks much to Les Ginsberg for taking them. > There was one ISP representative from Asia who commented but we did not get > his name. If this was you, please unicast me and I will update the minutes > with your name. > > Abhay and I will follow up with E-mails on specific documents presented at > IETF 81. > > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/minutes/ospf.txt > > Thanks, > Acee > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
_______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
