If you can't I can.
Please let me have the right text so I can cut and paste it in.
Thanks
Stewart
On 31/08/2011 21:13, Joel W. Gannett wrote:
Acee,
OK, that makes things consistent, too. And I guess yours is the
correct way to do it. Thanks for the prompt feedback!
I am happy to edit the errata to reflect your correction, but do I
have permission to edit it? I've never done this before, so I don't
know what the procedures are.
(Or, does one submit an errata for an errata?)
Joel Gannett
On 8/31/2011 3:58 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:
Hi Joel,
There is a problem but actually it is R4's cost to N8 that is wrong
in Table 6. It should be 25 rather than 18. Can this errata be edited?
Thanks,
Acee
On Aug 31, 2011, at 3:20 PM, RFC Errata System wrote:
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2328,
"OSPF Version 2".
--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2328&eid=2951
--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Joel Gannett<[email protected]>
Section: 3.4
Original Text
-------------
Destination RT3 adv. RT4 adv.
_________________________________
Ia,Ib 20 27
N6 16 15
N7 20 19
N8 18 18
N9-N11,H1 29 36
_________________________________
RT5 14 8
RT7 20 14
Table 6: Destinations advertised into Area 1
by Routers RT3 and RT4.
Corrected Text
--------------
Destination RT3 adv. RT4 adv.
_________________________________
Ia,Ib 20 27
N6 16 15
N7 20 19
N8 18 18
N9-N11,H1 29 29
_________________________________
RT5 14 8
RT7 20 14
Table 6: Destinations advertised into Area 1
by Routers RT3 and RT4.
Notes
-----
The distance from RT4 to N9-N11,H1 should be changed from 36 to 29
to be consistent with the row above that, which shows the distance
from RT3 to N8 and RT4 to N8 as the same value, 18. The length 18
path from RT3 to N8 is RT3-RT6-RT10-N8, while the length 18 path
from RT4 to N8 is RT4-RT5-RT7-RT10-N8. The summarized N9-N11,H1
network is a distance 11 beyond that, or 29 in both cases. The
length 29 path from RT3 to N9-N11,H1 is
RT3-RT6-RT10-RT11-(N9-N11,H1), and the length 29 path from RT4 to
N9-N11,H1 is RT4-RT5-RT7-RT10-RT11-(N9-N11,H1).
Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
--------------------------------------
RFC2328 (no draft string recorded)
--------------------------------------
Title : OSPF Version 2
Publication Date : April 1998
Author(s) : J. Moy
Category : STANDARD
Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP
Area : Routing
Stream : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG
--
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
