Hi Vladica, On Sep 20, 2011, at 2:49 PM, Vladica Stanisic wrote:
> Hi Acee, > > Section 3 OSPF Interface Instance ID > > Sentences > > The OSPF Interface ID will be added to this structure. > The Interface Instance ID will default to 0. > > Should this be > > The OSPF Interface Instance ID will be added to this structure. > The OSPF Interface Instance ID will default to 0. > > In order to be consistent with section name? Agreed - will update in the 05 version. > > > > Section 5. Backward Compatibility and Deployment Considerations > > What about ospf trap ospfConfigErrorType. One of the values is > authTypeMismatch. Would there be a large number of generated traps then? > There should be some note about traps as well. That's a good point. I will address this issue. Thanks, Acee > > > Regards > Vladica > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Acee > Lindem > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 1:40 PM > To: OSPF List > Subject: [OSPF] WG Last Call for OSPF Multi-Instance Extensions - > draft-ietf-ospf-multi-instance-04.txt > > All, > > This is start a two-week working group last call on > draft-ietf-ospf-multi-instance-04.txt > > This working group last call ends Oct. 4th. Please send your comments to the > OSPF WG mailing list. > > We discussed last calling this document at IETF 81. While not necessarily a > requirement, there is also an implementation. > > Here is a URL for your convenience: > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ospf-multi-instance-04.txt > > Thanks, > > Acee and Abhay > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
