Stewart, Adrian, Approved for state change to verified. Thanks, Acee On Sep 28, 2011, at 10:35 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5250, > "The OSPF Opaque LSA Option". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5250&eid=2982 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Gary Cote <[email protected]> > > Section: A.2 > > Original Text > ------------- > See section 7 of this document for a description of Opaque type allocation > and assignment. > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > See section 9 of this document for a description of Opaque type allocation > and assignment. > > > Notes > ----- > Section 7 was the "IANA Considerations" section in the previous RFC, 2370. > > IANA Considerations are included in Section 9 of this document. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC5250 (draft-ietf-ospf-rfc2370bis-05) > -------------------------------------- > Title : The OSPF Opaque LSA Option > Publication Date : July 2008 > Author(s) : L. Berger, I. Bryskin, A. Zinin, R. Coltun > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP > Area : Routing > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
