I agree with Shishio that high-link metric should certainly be covered. There are some cases where one method may be preferred to the other, so network operators should have the choice.
Regards, Michael ------ Original Message ------ Received: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:02:57 PM PDT From: Shishio Tsuchiya <[email protected]> To: [email protected]: [email protected], [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSPF] status of draft-ietf-ospf-rfc3137bis > I could not find any difference essentially in 2 modes when I wrote the draft and discuss about this topic. > But merit of high-link metric are > -easy to implementation : most of vendor already supported this mode. > -same operation OSPFv2 and OSPFv3: the operator needs to check metric value.(do not need to know new bit) > > I agree R-bit should be preferred option, but I think the draft should describe high-link metric also. > > Regards, > -Shishio _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
