> -----Original Message----- > From: Acee Lindem [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 11:29 AM ... > > Besides from the reference (see below), what else do you think we > should include? > > > > The point I'm trying to make is: rfc5340 already defines and > documents the R-bit functionality (and it is the standard!). IMHO, > there is no need to rehash here what is already defined and explained > somewhere else...which is why I think the reference is enough. > > I don't think you have to describe the mechanism. However, I agree R- > bit should be on equal ground as the max-metric links. Also, it would > be good to point out the difference in behavior. With max-metric links, > transit traffic is discouraged while with the R-bit, transit traffic is > completely suppressed.
Ok, I'll work on that. Alvaro. _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
