Hi Alvaro, On Oct 5, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote:
> Acee: > > Hi! > > I unfortunately won't we able to stay the whole week, so I wanted to give a > short opinion on your comment below. How can you go home early? It is only 1 hour 25 minutes by plane. Who is going to take the minutes ;^) ? > > On 10/5/12 9:17 AM, "Acee Lindem" <[email protected]> wrote: > > If time allows, I'd like to lead a general discussion on the direction the WG > wishes to take with respect to scaling. We have the TTZ draft on table but > some, including myself, are not convinced this is the right direction to > improve OSPF scaling. > > IMHO, starting form a potential solution and backing up to a problem that > (maybe) needs to be solved is the wrong approach. Instead, the discussion > should be around what problem(s) we want/need to solve. Having a clear > description of the requirements will allow us to figure out whether TTZ (or > any other proposal) fits the bill, or not. I agree that we should start with use cases and the OSPF dimension(s) which is/are the limiting factor(s). Thanks, Acee > > Thanks! > > Alvaro.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
