Thank you Acee
I will wait a couple of weeks to give the OSPF WG a chance
to comment and take silence as agreement with your proposal.
Stewart
On 13/01/2013 12:04, Acee Lindem wrote:
All,
Since section is 11 is describing the contents of a single routing table entry, there is
only one destination and adding "same" would be redundant. Hence, I recommend
that this errata be rejected.
Thanks,
Acee
On Jan 12, 2013, at 9:39 PM, RFC Errata System wrote:
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2328,
"OSPF Version 2".
--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2328&eid=3452
--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: David Jet <[email protected]>
Section: 11
Original Text
-------------
Multiple LSAs may reference the destination, however a tie-breaking scheme
always reduces the choice to a single LSA.
Corrected Text
--------------
Multiple LSAs may reference the same destination, however a tie-breaking scheme
always reduces the choice to a single LSA.
Notes
-----
I think should add the "same" to describe it more clearly.
Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
--------------------------------------
RFC2328 (no draft string recorded)
--------------------------------------
Title : OSPF Version 2
Publication Date : April 1998
Author(s) : J. Moy
Category : STANDARD
Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP
Area : Routing
Stream : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG
.
--
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
