Speaking as a WG member, On 3/20/13 1:29 PM, "Minto Jeyananth" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi Authors, > >Expert from the draft > > "One of the implications of such busy periods of state restoration in > a process is that, the process may not be able to sustain the rate of > sending HELLOs across all its interfaces. In a controlled restart > scenario (such as OSPF Graceful restart), the router is able to ask > for a grace period by flooding out opaque LSAs indicating that it is > restarting. In case of upgrades and restarts with state restoration, > (i.e., not involving a graceful restart), this is not possible." > >Does not it a pure implementation issue? Implementation could simply >prevent such an unsupported configuration. >With BFD does OSPF needs aggressive interval? Normally, BFD is used for sub-second convergence. If there is some control plane switchover, the new active OSPF process must be able to send a hello on all interfaces before the dead interval expires. I feel this draft is more useful for OSPFv3 auto configuration. Thanks, Acee > > >Thanks >-minto > > >_______________________________________________ >OSPF mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
