Tom,
Thanks for your review and comments. I added a motivating paragraph as
you suggested, and submitted the revised draft:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr-03.txt
Richard
On 6/1/2013 3:28 PM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote:
All,
I'd like to start a 3 week WG last call on the subject document. The last call
will end at
12:00 AM PDT on April 29th, 2012. Please review the document and send any
comments to the
list prior to that time. Here is a URL for your convenience:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr/
Acee and Richard,
I realize that WGLC has passed on this draft, but I recently reviewed the
latest (-02) version of this draft and had a few comments:
- I did not perceive any technical problems; however, I have not implemented or
tested it
- the capability supports an important use case for OSPF MDR, and I think the
section 2 guidance will be helpful to experimenters
- I think the draft could be (optionally) improved for readers with an additional
motivating statement, along the lines of what is stated in RFC 6845. Perhaps something
at the bottom of page 1 like: "The rationale for using this interface type for
single-hop broadcast networks, instead of a broadcast interface type, is to represent the
underlying network in a point-to-multipoint manner, to allow finer granularity of
neighbor cost settings. In this sense, this document shows how the OSPF MDR interface
type can be configured to provide the same kind of interface as specified in
[RFC6845]."
Overall, it seems to be ready to publish.
- Tom
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2242 / Virus Database: 3184/5876 - Release Date: 06/02/13
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
