Hi Acee, I distinguish between the word MANET and OSPF they are not the same thing but all are for same IETF. One is a network and the other is a protocol, so the network is more general than a protocol in terms of applicability. The RFC5614 is specification related to the MANET network, but I know that this WG done the work, but I always think it is important to have joint work between related WGs participants not separation within IETF. All RFCs are for the same IETF so they should be related some how.
Abdu On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Acee Lindem <[email protected]>wrote: > Abdu, > > This is an extension to an existing OSPF specification (FRC 5614). Even if > it weren't, the OSPF WG has no mandate to adhere to RFC 5444 or any other > MANET WG documents. Since this work was previously done in the OSPF WG, > there is no reason to even consider bringing it to MANET (although we > welcome their review). > > Thanks, > Acee > > On Jun 16, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote: > > > The following were first of my comments on the document and I got some > answers; > > > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg15401.html > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg15418.html > > > > Answers > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg15408.html > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg79931.html > > > > As a request from the chair and for wg information, after I got to be > > subscribed in this WG. Thanking you, > > > > AB > > _______________________________________________ > > OSPF mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > >
_______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
