Hi Acee,
you have my strong support on this one.
thanks,
Peter
On 9/16/13 14:24 , Acee Lindem wrote:
This version includes changes in support of backward compatibility. Speaking as
both a WG chair and author, this document is essential to OSPFv3 protocol
extension. Please indicate your support or objections by September 30th, 2013.
Thanks,
Acee
On Sep 10, 2013, at 5:54 PM, <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> wrote:
A new version of I-D, draft-acee-ospfv3-lsa-extend-02.txt
has been successfully submitted by Acee Lindem and posted to the
IETF repository.
Filename: draft-acee-ospfv3-lsa-extend
Revision: 02
Title: OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility
Creation date: 2013-09-10
Group: Individual Submission
Number of pages: 29
URL:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-acee-ospfv3-lsa-extend-02.txt
Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-ospfv3-lsa-extend
Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-acee-ospfv3-lsa-extend-02
Diff:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-acee-ospfv3-lsa-extend-02
Abstract:
OSPFv3 requires functional extension beyond what can readily be done
with the fixed-format Link State Advertisement (LSA) as described in
RFC 5340. Without LSA extension, attributes associated with OSPFv3
links and advertised IPv6 prefixes must be advertised in separate
LSAs and correlated to the fixed-format LSA. This document extends
the LSA format by allowing the optional inclusion of Type-Length-
Value (TLV) tuples in the LSAs. Backward compatibility mechanisms
are also described.
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
