On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 12:55:00PM +0100, A. Przygienda wrote: > Thinking further, maybe in the type of TLV encoding it would be good to > think about having a 'mandatory/transitory/optional' bit in terms of use > by routers (kind of ripping off the BGP'ish and other TLV encodings). > Just food for thought here when starting to think about e.g. aggregation > of TLVs over prefixes and so on.
I suggested that a while ago, and in the end it was dismantled because there was no real use case that didn't fall apart. If you can come up with a good design and something close to a realistic scenario where this is used... -David _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
