All, This version has been reorganized to separate the definitions of the TLVs and sub-TLVs from the Extended LSAs (Alan Davey's suggestion). It also includes the changes to the compatibility section discussed during the OSPF WG meeting in London (David Lamparter's input). Thanks, Acee
On 4/18/14 8:36 AM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > >A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-02.txt >has been successfully submitted by Acee Lindem and posted to the >IETF repository. > >Name: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend >Revision: 02 >Title: OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility >Document date: 2014-04-18 >Group: ospf >Pages: 35 >URL: >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-02.t >xt >Status: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend/ >Htmlized: >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-02 >Diff: >http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-02 > >Abstract: > OSPFv3 requires functional extension beyond what can readily be done > with the fixed-format Link State Advertisement (LSA) as described in > RFC 5340. Without LSA extension, attributes associated with OSPFv3 > links and advertised IPv6 prefixes must be advertised in separate > LSAs and correlated to the fixed-format LSAs. This document extends > the LSA format by encoding the existing OSPFv3 LSA information in > Type-Length-Value (TLV) tuples and allowing advertisement of > additional information with additional TLVs. Backward compatibility > mechanisms are also described. > > > > > >Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >submission >until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > >The IETF Secretariat > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
