Adrian, Alia,
This editorial errata is correct.
Acee

-----Original Message-----
From: RFC Errata System <[email protected]>
Date: Sunday, April 27, 2014 12:43 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, Alia Atlas <[email protected]>, Adrian Farrel
<[email protected]>, Abhay Roy <[email protected]>, Ericsson
<[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, OSPF - OSPF
WG List <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6969 (3976)

>The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6969,
>"OSPFv3 Instance ID Registry Update".
>
>--------------------------------------
>You may review the report below and at:
>http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6969&eid=3976
>
>--------------------------------------
>Type: Editorial
>Reported by: Peter PalĂșch <[email protected]>
>
>Section: 2
>
>Original Text
>-------------
>   +--------------------------+---------------+-----------------------+
>   | Value                    | Description   | Reference             |
>   +--------------------------+---------------+-----------------------+
>   | 128-191                  | Unassigned    | 192-255               |
>   | Reserved for Private Use | this document | Private Use [RFC5226] |
>   +--------------------------+---------------+-----------------------+
>
>
>Corrected Text
>--------------
>   +-------------+--------------------------+-------------------------+
>   | Value       | Description              | Reference               |
>   +-------------+--------------------------+-------------------------+
>   | 128-191     | Unassigned               |                         |
>   | 192-255     | Reserved for Private Use | This Document [RFC6969] |
>   +-------------+--------------------------+-------------------------+
>
>
>Notes
>-----
>The table was obviously misformatted.
>
>Instructions:
>-------------
>This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
>--------------------------------------
>RFC6969 (draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-iid-registry-update-04)
>--------------------------------------
>Title               : OSPFv3 Instance ID Registry Update
>Publication Date    : July 2013
>Author(s)           : A. Retana, D. Cheng
>Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>Source              : Open Shortest Path First IGP
>Area                : Routing
>Stream              : IETF
>Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

Reply via email to