Adrian, Alia, This technical errata is correct. Acee -----Original Message----- From: RFC Errata System <[email protected]> Date: Monday, April 28, 2014 8:15 AM To: Yi Yang <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Abhay Roy <[email protected]>, Alia Atlas <[email protected]>, Adrian Farrel <[email protected]>, Abhay Roy <[email protected]>, Ericsson <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, OSPF - OSPF WG List <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6860 (3977)
>The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6860, >"Hiding Transit-Only Networks in OSPF". > >-------------------------------------- >You may review the report below and at: >http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6860&eid=3977 > >-------------------------------------- >Type: Technical >Reported by: Peter Paluch <[email protected]> > >Section: 3 > >Original Text >------------- > To hide a transit-only network in [OSPFv3], the IPv6 address prefixes > are omitted from the router-LSA. Consequently, when a Designated > Router builds an intra-area-prefix-LSA referencing a network-LSA, > these IPv6 address prefixes will be omitted. > >Corrected Text >-------------- > To hide a transit-only network in [OSPFv3], the associated IPv6 > address prefixes MUST be omitted from the link-LSA. Consequently, > when a Designated Router builds an intra-area-prefix-LSA referencing > a network-LSA, these IPv6 address prefixes will be omitted. > > >Notes >----- >The change essentially reverts the paragraph back to the formulation from >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-05#section-3 . >Most importantly, the term "router-LSA" is replaced with "link-LSA", as >there are already no prefixes carried in OSFPv3 router-LSA whatsoever, >and the removal of transit-network prefixes influences link-LSAs and >intra-area-prefix-LSAs. Also, the change reintroduces the keyword "MUST" >that underlines the behavior that is crucial to the proper implementation >of the feature. > >Instructions: >------------- >This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > >-------------------------------------- >RFC6860 (draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-07) >-------------------------------------- >Title : Hiding Transit-Only Networks in OSPF >Publication Date : January 2013 >Author(s) : Y. Yang, A. Retana, A. Roy >Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP >Area : Routing >Stream : IETF >Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
