> -----Original Message----- > From: OSPF [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Psenak > Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 4:10 PM > To: Acee Lindem > Cc: OSPF List > Subject: Re: [OSPF] Comments > draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-00.txt > > Hi Acee, > > please see inline: > > On 7/2/14 19:17 , Acee Lindem wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > It seems there are two distinct deployment scenarios - one where SR routers > are given a range and policy and allocate their own SIDs and another where a > mapping server does it for the routing domain. > > yes, that is correct. The latter is used mainly during migration from LDP to > SR.
The mapping server could actually be used to advertise global SIDs for all the SR-capable nodes as well (see http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-ospf-global-label-sid-adv-00). In this way, the potential risk of global SID allocation collision can be avoided. Best regards, Xiaohu _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
