Hi Abhay, Thanks for the review. We'll update the draft with these comments in the next revision.
Can we request the chairs to poll the WG for accepting this as a WG doc? Cheers, Manav On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Abhay Roy <a...@cisco.com> wrote: > [speaking as WG member] > > Two comments.. > > 1. Section 3 has this text - "This TLV is only applicable to OSPFv2.". > I believe, this should also be applicable to RFC5838, i.e. for IPv4 AF's > > 2. Section 3 and 4 describes the scope as SHOULD be domain-wide. I > personally don't see any real use cause of any lessor scope (Area or Link) > since we have mechanisms to generate routable IP address for those scopes > already. So I would suggest we limit the scope of this document to be "MUST > be domain-wide". Any concerns with that? > > Regards, > -Abhay > > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
