Dear Chairs, I support this and it's useful.
-- Uma C. -----Original Message----- From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Abhay Roy Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 12:05 PM To: ospf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG adoption---draft-chen-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3? We have strong support from all the authors to accept this work ;-) Can a few non-authors also chime in with their thoughts/support? Speaking as a WG member, I support this work because it also fixes the Virtual Link limitation we left unsupported in RFC5838 for IPv4 Unicast AF. Regards, -Abhay On 7/22/14, 5:53 PM, Ing-Wher Chen wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to ask if the working group would adopt and help improve and > refine the following draft: > > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3 > /> > > This document describes a mechanism to transport OSPfv3 over IPv4. > The mechanism allows devices to migrate to OSPFv3 first, which would > help with transition to IPv6 later. > > The latest -01 version addresses an earlier question by including an > IPv4-only use case in which deployed devices cannot communicate in > IPv6 but would benefit from using the mechanism proposed in this draft > to transition to OSPFv3 for now. Until all devices can communicate > using IPv6, consolidating to OSPFv3 can still reduce operational complexity > and cost. > > Thanks, > Helen > > > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
