Hi all, This document discusses the use cases that OSPF is used to distribute FlowSpec routes. This document also defines a new OSPF FlowSpec Opaque Link State Advertisement (LSA) encoding format. Your comments are appreciated.
Best Regards, Jianjie -----邮件原件----- 发件人: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] 发送时间: 2014年9月28日 10:32 收件人: Youjianjie; Youjianjie; liuweihang; liuweihang 主题: New Version Notification for draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt A new version of I-D, draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Jianjie You and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions Revision: 01 Title: OSPF Extensions for Flow Specification Document date: 2014-09-27 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 11 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions/ Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01 Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01 Abstract: This document discusses the use cases why OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) distributing flow specification (FlowSpec) routes is necessary. This document also defines a new OSPF FlowSpec Opaque Link State Advertisement (LSA) encoding format that can be used to distribute FlowSpec routes. For the network only deploying IGP (Interior Gateway Protocol) (e.g. OSPF), it is expected to extend IGP to distribute FlowSpec routes. One advantage is to mitigate the impacts of Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
