Brian Haberman has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I agree with Stephen that the specified use cases seem to warrant a stronger recommendation to provide authentication and confidentiality. The tools are available, so why are they not being recommended in this instance? _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
