Hi Carlos, I think we need to add the following in the current version:
“When multiple S-BFD discriminators are advertised how a given discriminator is mapped to a specific use case is out of scope for this document.” I dont have the xml with me that i can update. Can you do it if you have one with you? Cheers, Manav On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) < cpign...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi, Acee, > > On Feb 4, 2016, at 2:24 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com> wrote: > > Hi Carlos, > > From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpign...@cisco.com> > Date: Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 2:16 PM > To: Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com> > Cc: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsb...@cisco.com>, Manav Bhatia < > manavbha...@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discrimina...@ietf.org" < > draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discrimina...@ietf.org>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator > > Hi, Acee, > > Following up on your note below regarding > draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator, could you request publication and send > this document to the IESG? > > > Has the document been updated with the proposed text? It hasn’t been > modified since Sept 24, 2015. > > > Yes. The only text modification proposed and to be implemented was done > here: > > https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator-02.txt > > I do not believe there was anything else pending. Do you mean something > else? > > Thanks! > > Carlos. > > Thanks, > Acee > > > [BTW, its sibling document on ISIS is already in IESG ballot.] > > Thanks! > > — Carlos. > > On Nov 11, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com> wrote: > > I was more concerned about the consumer of the information than the IGPs. > I did look at base S-BFD draft and I agree this unspecified. Let’s go > forward than with the proposed text and I will request publication. > > Thanks, > Acee > > > > >
_______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
