Hi, Pete,

Many thanks for your review.

Good catches, I agree with the three editorial suggestions below. I’ve made 
these changes in our working copy.

Thanks,

— Carlos.

> On Apr 18, 2016, at 12:09 PM, Pete Resnick <presn...@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review 
> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the 
> IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call 
> comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at 
> <​http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq%3E>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator-04
> Reviewer: Pete Resnick
> Review Date: 2016-04-18
> IETF LC End Date: 2016-04-26
> IESG Telechat date: 2016-05-05
> 
> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments: Two clarifications, one typo:
> 
> 2.1:
> 
> OLD
> Type - S-BFD Discriminator TLV Type
> NEW
> Type - S-BFD Discriminator TLV Type (TBD [to be filled in by IANA])
> END
> 
> OLD
> Length - Total length of the discriminator (Value field) in octets,
> not including the optional padding. The Length is a multiple of 4
> octets, and consequently specifies how many Discriminators are
> included in the TLV.
> NEW
> Length - Total length of the discriminator(s) that appear in the
> Value field, in octets. Each discriminator is 4 octets, so the Length
> is 4 times the number of Discriminators included in the TLV. There is
> no optional padding for this field.
> END
> 
> 2.2:
> 
> OLD
> Note that the S-BFD session may be required to pan multiple areas
> NEW
> Note that the S-BFD session may be required to span multiple areas
> END
> 
> --
> Pete Resnick http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/ 
> <http://www.qualcomm.com/%7Epresnick/>
> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

Reply via email to