Hello Acee,

Yes, it is addition, but I have no idea about another way how to add this 
clarification rather than via errata tool.

Thank you.


6 мая 2016 г., 4:40 +0300, Acee Lindem (acee)<[email protected]>, писал:
> The text below is technically correct (other than the grammar). However,
> I’d view it more as additional information than an actual errata.
>  
> Thanks,
> Acee
>  
> On 5/5/16, 8:17 PM, "RFC Errata System"<[email protected]>wrote:
>  
> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6987,
> > "OSPF Stub Router Advertisement".
> >  
> > --------------------------------------
> > You may review the report below and at:
> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6987&eid=4685
> >  
> > --------------------------------------
> > Type: Technical
> > Reported by: Alexander Okonnikov<[email protected]
> >  
> > Section: 4
> >  
> > Original Text
> > -------------
> >  
> >  
> > Corrected Text
> > --------------
> > (At the end of the section)
> >  
> > If the stub router is located in transit area, crossed by virtual
> > link(s), latter will become inoperational in case the stub router is
> > on path between two virtual link endpoints - either due to only path
> > in transit area or due to topology changes which move stub router onto
> > this path.
> >  
> > Notes
> > -----
> > Virtual links become inoperational in case path metric between two
> > endpoints is>0xffff. Path metric of two or more links, one of which has
> > MaxLinkMetric, will inevitably exceed value 0xffff.
> >  
> > Instructions:
> > -------------
> > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> >  
> > --------------------------------------
> > RFC6987 (draft-ietf-ospf-rfc3137bis-04)
> > --------------------------------------
> > Title : OSPF Stub Router Advertisement
> > Publication Date : September 2013
> > Author(s) : A. Retana, L. Nguyen, A. Zinin, R. White, D.
> > McPherson
> > Category : INFORMATIONAL
> > Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP
> > Area : Routing
> > Stream : IETF
> > Verifying Party : IESG
> >  
>  
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

Reply via email to