Hi Acee, I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR.
Thanks, Jeff On 6/3/16, 2:45 PM, "OSPF on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >Authors, > >For the final time, can you confirm whether or not you are aware of any >IPR other than? > >https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2401/ >https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2233/ (the IPR statement on the non-WG >draft version) > >Thanks, >Acee > >On 6/2/16, 10:04 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>The WG last call ended a couple weeks ago and I will act as document >>shepherd and request publication. >>Thanks, >>Acee >> >>On 5/4/16, 11:41 AM, "OSPF on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)" >><[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >> >>>The subject draft is very stable, has multiple interoperable >>>implementations, and many (including myself) have done thorough reviews. >>>I >>>believe we are ready for WG last call for this very important draft. >>> >>>With great pleasure, this begins the WG last call for the subject draft. >>>Please send your comments to this list prior to 12:00 AM GMT, May 19th, >>>2016. >>> >>>Here is a URL for your convenance: >>> >>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensio >>>n >>>s >>>/ >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Acee >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>OSPF mailing list >>>[email protected] >>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >> > >_______________________________________________ >OSPF mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
