Hi Manav,
thanks for your review.
I just published new revision of the draft addressing comments of
the second Routing Directorate review (by Ice Wijnands). In brief, there
is a mention of applicability to sub-LSPs of a Point-to-Multipoint LSP
and rewritten example (hopefully, for better readability).
Anton
On 06/10/2016 06:56 AM, Manav Bhatia wrote:
Hello,
I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft.
The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related
drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and
sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide
assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing
Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir
Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it
would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF
Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through
discussion or by updating the draft.
Document: draft-smirnov-ospf-xaf-te
Reviewer: Manav Bhatia
Review Date: 10/06/2016
IETF LC End Date: date-if-known
Intended Status: Standards Track
Summary: No issues found. This document is ready for publication.
The draft proposes something that prima facie appears reasonable --
using a single OSPF instance to set up TE LSPs for both v4 and v6.
Comments:
The draft is quite simple and i see no technical issues. However, i
would like this to go through the regular IETF WG process before it gets
pushed to the publication pipeline.
Cheers, Manav
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
