Speaking as WG member: One area of mild contention with this draft has been whether the advertisement that the link is being taken out of service needs to be advertised beyond the link endpoint router (which will take the appropriate action of advertising the maximum link metric in the reverse direction). We have gotten somewhat entangled into use case discussions and whether or not this is really necessary.
What I’d like to propose is that offer the alternative of advertising the OSPF RI LSA with link-scope (fully supported by RFC 7770). This way, the advertisement could be restricted to the local link in situations where the knowledge doesn’t really need to go anywhere else. Note that the current text doesn’t prevent this so this is merely a matter of describing the use case. Thanks, Acee _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
