Hi Jari, 

> On Jun 29, 2016, at 6:11 PM, Jari Arkko <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3-11: Yes
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I support this document going forward.
> 
> However, in Section 4 it says:
> 
>   Consequently, an OSPFv3 packet
>   transported within an IPv4 packet requires IPsec to provide
>   authentication and confidentiality.  Further work such as [ipsecospf]
>   would be required to support IPsec protection for OSPFv3 over IPv4
>   transport.
> 
> And I had trouble understanding what you meant by this, exactly. IPsec is
> required, but is not currently completely enough defined for OSPF to make
> this possible? If so, I'd suggest using the words:
> 
>   Consequently, an OSPFv3 packet
>   transported within an IPv4 packet requires IPsec to provide
>   authentication and confidentiality.  However,  further work such as
> [ipsecospf]
>   would be required to support IPsec protection for OSPFv3 over IPv4
>   transport.
> 
> But maybe I am misunderstanding what was meant here.

I think I see your point. How about: 

As specified in [RFC5340], OSPFv3 relies on IPsec [RFC4301] for 
authentication and confidentiality. [RFC 4552] specifies how IPsec is used
with OSPFv3 over IPv6 transport. In order to use OSPFv3 with IPv4
transport as specified herein, further work such as [ipsecospf] would
 be required. 

Thanks,
Acee 




> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

Reply via email to