Peter, Taking a looking at the whole paragraph into this sentence was added, I am not sure how to interpret it.
The SR-Algorithm Sub-TLV is optional. It MAY only be advertised once in the Router Information Opaque LSA. If the SID/Label Range TLV, as defined in Section 3.2, is advertised, then the SR-Algorithm TLV MUST also be advertised. If the SR-Algorithm TLV is not advertised by the node, such node is considered as not being segment routing capable. Is this sentence intended to imply that if a router does not advertise the SR-Algorithm TLV including algorithm X, then any prefix-SIDs for algorithm X advertised by that router will be ignored by other routers? If this is the intention, then it would be better to state is more explicitly. If not, then the intended meaning should be clarified. Thanks, Chris -----Original Message----- From: OSPF [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Psenak Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 3:30 AM To: OSPF List <[email protected]> Subject: [OSPF] OSPFv2 SR draft Hi All, following text has been added in the latest revision of the OSPFv2 SR draft, section 3.1. "If the SR-Algorithm TLV is not advertised by node, such node is considered as not being segment routing capable." Please let us know if there are any concerns regarding this addition. thanks, Peter _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
