Mark, On 10/02/2017 08:26, Mark Smith wrote: > On 10 Feb. 2017 03:02, "Veerendranatha Reddy Vallem" < > [email protected]> wrote: ... >> If Link local address is Link local, how we can use this address in SRH >> header, >> since IPv6 destination address should not be link local address as per >> IPv6 protocol. > > I'd be curious where you might have got that idea from. > LL addresses are perfectly fine as destination addresses, including for > application traffic. They're even preferred over global and ULA addresses > by default when there is a choice from a set.
Right, but if an SR header is travelling off-link, which I think must often be the case, it would be doubleplus ungood to include a LL address, which is meaningless off-link. So probably using a LL address in SRH needs to be strictly limited. Brian > Many of the advantages of LLs for end-user applications would also apply to > network applications such as SR. > > "How to use IPv6 Link-Local Addresses in Applications" > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-smith-ipv6-link-locals-apps-00 > > Regards, > Mark. > > > > If Adj-Sid is global ipv6 address, means we need to consider “global > ipv6 interface address” of the neighbor on the link? > > > > Regards, > > Veerendranath > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
