Hi Veerendranatha, From: Veerendranatha Reddy Vallem <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 1:19 AM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: OSPF WG List <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [OSPFv3 LSA Extn] Regarding 'Referenced LS Type ' in E-intra-area-prefix LSA Resent-From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Resent-To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Acee Lindem <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Fred Baker <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Deborah Brungard <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Alia Atlas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Resent-Date: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 1:21 AM
Dear Authors, The LS Referenced LS Type in E-intra-area-prefix LSA is either E-Router-LSA type (0xA021) or E-Network-LSA (0xA022), but not regular Router LSA type (0x2001) or Network LSA Type ( 0x2002). These values in header of E-intra-area-prefix LSA are not same as regular intra-area-prefix LSA's header. Can you please confirm. Yes - it is expected that OSPFv3 Extended LSA will be consistently originated within an area. I will make this clear in the next revision as this is different from the RFC 5340 Intra-area-prefix LSA. Thanks, Acee Regards, Veerendranath
_______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
