The question of OSPFv2 complete blocking of transit routing support (similar to OSPFv3) seems to come up every year or so. I’d like to WG last call this document. Does anyone see any issues? Thanks, Acee
On 6/14/17, 12:44 PM, "OSPF on behalf of internet-dra...@ietf.org" <ospf-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote: > >A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >directories. >This draft is a work item of the Open Shortest Path First IGP of the IETF. > > Title : H-bit Support for OSPFv2 > Authors : Keyur Patel > Padma Pillay-Esnault > Manish Bhardwaj > Serpil Bayraktar > Filename : draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-03.txt > Pages : 8 > Date : 2017-06-14 > >Abstract: > OSPFv3 defines an option field for router-LSAs known as a R-bit in > RFC5340. If the R-bit is clear, an OSPFv3 router can participate in > OSPF topology distribution without acting as a forwarder to forward > the transit traffic. In such cases, an OSPF router would only accept > traffic intended for local delivery. This draft defines R-bit > functionality for OSPFv2 defined in RFC2328. > > >The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit/ > >There are also htmlized versions available at: >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-03 >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-03 > >A diff from the previous version is available at: >https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-03 > > >Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >submission >until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > >Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > >_______________________________________________ >OSPF mailing list >OSPF@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
