Acee, can you refer to more specific section in https://www.ietf.org/id/ <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-07.txt> draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-07.txt <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-07.txt> <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-07.txt> ? I don't think that it is assumed that BSL 256 and 512 in the same subdomain would ever share labels ... I sent the conceptual model on the AD review for -architecture that all drafts follow (as far I understood/helped writing them) ...
--- tony On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Greg, Authors, > > I support publication. Also, I have two comments. > > 1. It is somewhat strange to make protocol drafts standards track while > the architecture and encapsulations are experimental. > 2. The OSPF encoding will not support the second example in > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-07.txt. In > this example, the BSL 256 and 512 are intermixed. While with the encoding, > they would need to be two separate ranges of labels. > > I also have some editorial comments but I’ll just pass them to the > authors. > > Thanks, > Acee > > From: BIER <bier-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Greg Shepherd < > gjs...@gmail.com> > Reply-To: "gjs...@gmail.com" <gjs...@gmail.com> > Date: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 5:34 PM > To: "b...@ietf.org" <b...@ietf.org>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org> > Subject: [Bier] WGLC: draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-05 > > BIER, OSPF > > At BIER WG meeting, IETF97 in Chicago, we decided to move forward to WGLC for > some of our docs. We learned that even once published the IESG has a > process to change the track of the RFC if the WG makes the case to move the > work from Informational to Standards track. The feedback from operators is > that RFC status was more important than track, and we won't be able to meet > our charter requirements to change track without deployment experience and > operator support. > > This email starts a two week timer for feedback on the draft: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions/ > > WGLC to run in parallel in both BIER and OSPF WGs due to the scope of the > work. > > Thanks, > Greg > (BIER Chairs) > > > > _______________________________________________ > BIER mailing list > b...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier > > -- *We’ve heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce the complete works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know that is not true.* —Robert Wilensky
_______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
