As is customary, I have done another AD review
of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06.  First, I'd like to thank the
authors for their work and the improvement.

I have one minor issue on the IANA section.

For the current FCFS space, I think it would be better to have
"Specification Required" so that there's a place to look to understand what
sub-TLVs are included.
If the WG is happy with FCFS, that is fine too.

I'm asking for an IETF Last Call and will put this on the telechat on Aug

OSPF mailing list

Reply via email to