OK thanks. I saw some other email threads on this. I think it is a bit arbitrary that access=yes is required isn't it? I mean, why prefer requiring access=yes for routing versus requiring access=no to prevent routing? I'm not sure of the benefit of this rule, anyway, I'll accept it.
My next question is about tagging routable tracks with access=yes. I have done this now, however, how long until I see updates on the OSRM map? It seems other people asked for this[1], but the issue was closed without a fix. Is there any intention of fixing it? Let's put it another way, if there is a highway=track without access=yes and I'd like to route along that track, is it impossible to get that route for at least a few days, except when I do my own build? I'm just trying to get a decent route along a track with minimal fuss. Thanks for your great work by the way! [1] https://github.com/DennisOSRM/Project-OSRM/issues/93 On 06/06/13 20:18, Dennis Luxen wrote: > If you roll your own installation, you can. Just uncomment the line in > profiles/car.lua. On the test instance, we don't route over tracks for > several reasons by default. If access is allowed you can, then you can just > add an appropriate access tag onto the way and then we will route over it. > > --Dennis > > Am 06.06.2013 um 10:11 schrieb Tony Morris <[email protected]>: > >> Hello, >> I am trying to create a route on OSRM however, it seems to refuse to use >> highway=track for the route. Can I somehow say it is ok to use tracks? >> >> -- >> Tony Morris >> http://tmorris.net/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OSRM-talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk -- Tony Morris http://tmorris.net/ _______________________________________________ OSRM-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
