Not a problem, I'll remove them from this proposal. I was just following the interest the Australian community seemed to have in this.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2014-03-17 1:13 GMT+01:00 Fernando Trebien <[email protected]>: > >> tracktype_profile = { >> ["grade1"] = math.huge, >> ["grade2"] = 45, >> ["grade3"] = 30, >> ["grade4"] = 20, >> ["grade5"] = 15, >> ["grade6"] = 9, >> ["grade7"] = 6, >> ["grade8"] = 3 >> } > > > > > This might be OT here, but I think you shouldn't use (i.e. "map") grade6 to > 8 in OSM, as they are not defined. tracktype=grade5 is already the worst > tracktype (what in your scheme seems to be grade8), so anything above > doesn't make sense logically. See also actual usage numbers: > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/tracktype#values > > cheers, > Martin -- Fernando Trebien +55 (51) 9962-5409 "The speed of computer chips doubles every 18 months." (Moore's law) "The speed of software halves every 18 months." (Gates' law) _______________________________________________ OSRM-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
