I suspected that. There are some files which aren't used in the process anymore. For instance, PBFParser::parseWay isn't used.
2015-02-18 18:31 GMT+01:00 Emil Tin <[email protected]>: > Sorry, no. Note also that the description is a bit outdated. > > Emil > > > On 18 Feb 2015, at 18:02 , Romain NKONGO <[email protected]> wrote: > > Do you have another version of the explanation on the processing chain > that the one in the Git documentation, on the page "Processus Flow"? Not > that this one didn't help me at all, but I'd like to know which files are > used to have a better idea where to search. > > > 2015-02-18 15:43 GMT+01:00 Emil Tin <[email protected]>: > >> >> >> What you call cyclability is often called impedance. Lua is the easy >> part. The hard part is making you you keep speed and impedance separate all >> the way through the processing chain, sine you still need speed to compute >> the travel time. >> >> >> >> >> >> Med venlig hilsen >> >> *Emil Tin* >> IT- og Processpecialist >> Trafik >> _______________________________ >> KØBENHAVNS KOMMUNE >> Teknik- og Miljøforvaltningen >> Byens Anvendelse >> >> >> >> Njalsgade 13 Vær. 1035 >> Postboks 380 >> 2300 København S >> >> >> >> Direkte >> >> 2369 5986 >> >> Mobil >> >> 2369 5986 >> >> Email >> >> [email protected] >> >> EAN >> >> 5798009493149 >> >> >> >> *Fra:* Romain NKONGO [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sendt:* 18. februar 2015 15:35 >> *Til:* Mailing list to discuss Project OSRM >> *Emne:* Re: [OSRM-talk] New way weight >> >> >> >> Hello Emil, >> >> As a matter of fact, the criterion which I'm trying to add is the >> cyclability, with an integer value from 1 to 5. With my project team, we >> already managed to include a Lua function in the bicycle profile which set >> this value according to tags like 'cycleway' and others. After that, we >> want to pass the value (as an attribute) all the way through the processing >> chain to the algorithm files. >> >> I'm not sure if I'm clear, if not tell me. >> >> Romain. >> >> >> >> 2015-02-18 15:17 GMT+01:00 Emil Tin <[email protected]>: >> >> Keeping speed and impedance separate is not an easy task. >> >> I worked on it a good while back in this branch, but it was never >> complete: >> https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/tree/feature/lua_impedance >> >> See also https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/77. >> >> >> >> Kind regards >> >> *Emil Tin* >> IT and Process Specialist >> Traffic >> _______________________________ >> CITY OF COPENHAGEN >> Technical and Environmental Department >> City in Use >> >> >> >> Njalsgade 13 Room. 118 >> Postbox 380 >> 2300 Copenhagen S >> >> >> >> Direct >> >> 2369 5986 >> >> Mobile >> >> 2369 5986 >> >> Email >> >> [email protected] >> >> EAN >> >> 5798009493149 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *Fra:* Romain NKONGO [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sendt:* 18. februar 2015 15:13 >> *Til:* Mailing list to discuss Project OSRM >> *Emne:* [OSRM-talk] New way weight >> >> >> >> Hello again everyone, >> >> Has anyone tried to add a new weight for the OSRM ways in addition of the >> speed? I try to add a cyclability criterion for the routing calculation and >> actually I look for every OSRM files where I could this attribute along >> with the speed so it will be taken into account in a bi-objective >> algorithm. Is there an easier way? >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OSRM-talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OSRM-talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk >> >> > _______________________________________________ > OSRM-talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk > > > > _______________________________________________ > OSRM-talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk > >
_______________________________________________ OSRM-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
