Hi Daniel
I'm running a release version of OSRM which I downloaded and compiled
from the instructions given.
The main thing I am after is the driving time and distance initially,
not interested in alternate route or anything else. In OSRM v4 using the
simpleclient.cpp as a base for my code, I used the following parameters:
// Set up the parameters required.
RouteParameters route_parameters;
route_parameters.zoom_level = 18; // no
generalization
route_parameters.print_instructions = false; // turn by
turn instructions
route_parameters.alternate_route = false; // get an
alternate route, too
route_parameters.geometry = false; //
retrieve geometry of route
route_parameters.compression = false; //
polyline encoding
route_parameters.check_sum = -1; // see wiki
route_parameters.service = "viaroute"; // that's
routing
route_parameters.output_format = "json";
route_parameters.jsonp_parameter = ""; // set for jsonp
wrapping
I did try and search in the source code for the equivalent, but couldn't
find the right source file. Found plenty of references to
parseParameters etc but nothing that I could say for definite were the
actual parameters.
Regards
On 26-Apr-16 11:24 AM, Daniel Hofmann wrote:
Yes we benchmarked v5 and v4 in
https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/2211
found some regressions and considerably improved v5 in
https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/2241
Are you running the v5 release (and not a RC)?
What's your specific use-case?
If you enable steps and alternatives the response is larger than in v4
and especially assembling all the GeoJSON objects / variants has some
allocation issues. If that's the case, try the Polyline format.
Daniel J H
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:43 AM, James Grant <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi there.
Has anyone done any comparisons between version 4 and 5 of OSRM
speed wise when looking at the C++ examples (the simpleclient.cpp
and example.cpp)?
I've now built version 5 and the example.cpp but on first
appearances, it is slower than version 4. I will have to recompile
the simpleclient.cpp with the same parameters as I've currently
got to directly compare speed.
Regards
_______________________________________________
OSRM-talk mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
_______________________________________________
OSRM-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
_______________________________________________
OSRM-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
