yeah, it is tagged that way because I did so on Friday. (I asked the talk-gb bunch and they told me to be bold)
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Philip Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 14:21 +0000, Alan Bell wrote: > > Hi all > > > > there is a segment of Oxford Street in London from about the Park > > Street/Portman Street crossing to Regent Street where the turn > > restrictions prevent you from going straight on into it, or turning > > left > > or right from any of the crossing roads. > > > > http://map.project-osrm.org/?z=15¢er=51.514218%2C-0.130098&loc=51 > > .515313%2C-0.140419&loc=51.514525%2C-0.147876&hl=en&alt=0 > > > > so without any one way street issues, this is an area of perfectly > > good > > road from which you can exit but never enter. > > > > I am not entirely sure what the facts on the ground are (it isn't a > > very > > sensible place to be driving) but is there something that can be done > > in > > the profile or by editing the map to avoid that bit of road if it > > has > > actually been pedestrianised or something? > > > > Alan. > > > Hi Alan > I looks perfectly correct to me, you can access certain sections to > leave side streets. The section you were initially going into is tagged > as motor_vehicle=no, bus=yes, psv=yes. > > There is nothing wrong with OSRM in this area. > > If you are unsure it would be better to ask on talk-gb where you will > find local mappers who can explain the reasoning for the tagging. > > Or try #osm-gb on irc. > > Phil (trigpoint) > > > > _______________________________________________ > OSRM-talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk >
_______________________________________________ OSRM-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
